From Shepherding the Small Church, by Glenn DamanWithin the small church, it is not the position that gives power and authority to the individual but the relationships the person has with the other members. Consequently, the pastor is often not the primary leader of the congregation. That role is often given to an individual or individuals who, by their personal interaction with others, influence the rest of the church."
...
This is especially true regarding the vision and direction of the church. Whereas in the large church, the senior pastor sets the direction of the church, in the small congregation the vision must arise from the people themselves. Rather than the pastor being the vision setter, he becomes the vision facilitator, one who helps and coaches the congregation as they set the agenda for the future."
...
The small church is owned and operated by the laity rather than the pastor. Because of this, the pastor is less important to the operation and health of the small church than the larger counterpart. While the pastor may retain the title, the power of the church belongs to the people who have built and operated the church for generations. If the pastor comes into conflict with that authority, then the pastor will often be asked to leave."
1 comment:
Just FYI. The book isn't against small churches but merely making an observation. I really do agree with you. The reason I asked for good or for bad was because I think it can work both ways (positive or negative). But I think his observations (generalizations) are mostly right on. When we think of powerful laity, we do think carnality. But the truth is, Christ is the head of the church and the pastor should only lead with a biblical agenda. I think he has the responsibility to convince the laity of biblical principle. And this is easier to do in a larger church than a smaller church. For good or for bad...
What do you think?
BTW, very good and thought provoking book.
Post a Comment